Nonfiction Blog Post
In the article To Kill or Not to Kill, the author, Patricia Smith, is trying to portray the conflict of the death penalty around the world. After very recent executions by the lethal injection, new debate arose around the death penalty due to the fact that many Americans were disturbed by seeing the executions take place. The author goes on to discuss many other unsettling examples of the death penalty and how many things could go wrong if we were to keep turning to it, for example, taking the life of an innocent person and not being able to change anything. The author has strongly sided against the death penalty and is trying to teach readers how it is the wrong form of punishment.
One way the author shows the readers that the death penalty is wrong is by telling of all the different methods of execution to give an example of how disturbing the death penalty is. For example, there is a whole section of the article that tells in depth about how the Hanging, Electric Chair, Lethal Injection, Gas Chamber, Burning/Shooting and other obscure methods work to kill criminals and exactly how many criminals each method has exterminated. This part of the text helped to paint a picture of every quite sickening method that prisoners can be killed and how it can be inapt even for a criminal who has done something very wrong. In the article, another way the author opposed the death penalty is by showing that sometimes it can go wrong, not only just killing their victim but also harshly torturing them on the way. For example, the text states " “Everyone watching the execution of Clayton Lockett last April knew instantly that something had gone terribly wrong. Lockett was strapped to a gurney in the death chamber of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary and had been given an injection when he started kicking, twitching, and then writhing and moaning in agony.” This piece of text showed that no mercy is given to prisoners by their executers even when something so horrible like this happens. This quote used by the author can have a strong effect on the reader because it shows how harsh and brutal the death penalty can be and can draw even sympathy out of someone for the victim.
Another example of how the author argues against the death penalty is that in the text, the author talks about how the death penalty can actually be viewed as a very hypocritical punishment. For example, "Opponents say that killing is wrong no matter who is doing it, even the government, and that it's too final a punishment in a world where mistakes can happen." This piece of evidence made me think that people are being punished by death after committing crimes such as murder which ironic in a sense because regardless of who is doing the killing, the crime at hand is really being punished with only more crime which is unfair.
Before reading this article, I didn't really think much of the death penalty because I felt that if someone was sentenced to death, it had to have been for a good reason. However, after reading this article, the author has able to gear my opinions towards being against the death penalty. I realized how sick and disturbing the ways criminals were killed and it made me feel that no matter the crime, nobody deserves to be put through torture like this, as many mistakes can occur. The whole death penalty itself is very risky and unsettling and there are plenty of other methods that could be more suitable as punishment.
One way the author shows the readers that the death penalty is wrong is by telling of all the different methods of execution to give an example of how disturbing the death penalty is. For example, there is a whole section of the article that tells in depth about how the Hanging, Electric Chair, Lethal Injection, Gas Chamber, Burning/Shooting and other obscure methods work to kill criminals and exactly how many criminals each method has exterminated. This part of the text helped to paint a picture of every quite sickening method that prisoners can be killed and how it can be inapt even for a criminal who has done something very wrong. In the article, another way the author opposed the death penalty is by showing that sometimes it can go wrong, not only just killing their victim but also harshly torturing them on the way. For example, the text states " “Everyone watching the execution of Clayton Lockett last April knew instantly that something had gone terribly wrong. Lockett was strapped to a gurney in the death chamber of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary and had been given an injection when he started kicking, twitching, and then writhing and moaning in agony.” This piece of text showed that no mercy is given to prisoners by their executers even when something so horrible like this happens. This quote used by the author can have a strong effect on the reader because it shows how harsh and brutal the death penalty can be and can draw even sympathy out of someone for the victim.
Another example of how the author argues against the death penalty is that in the text, the author talks about how the death penalty can actually be viewed as a very hypocritical punishment. For example, "Opponents say that killing is wrong no matter who is doing it, even the government, and that it's too final a punishment in a world where mistakes can happen." This piece of evidence made me think that people are being punished by death after committing crimes such as murder which ironic in a sense because regardless of who is doing the killing, the crime at hand is really being punished with only more crime which is unfair.
Before reading this article, I didn't really think much of the death penalty because I felt that if someone was sentenced to death, it had to have been for a good reason. However, after reading this article, the author has able to gear my opinions towards being against the death penalty. I realized how sick and disturbing the ways criminals were killed and it made me feel that no matter the crime, nobody deserves to be put through torture like this, as many mistakes can occur. The whole death penalty itself is very risky and unsettling and there are plenty of other methods that could be more suitable as punishment.
No comments:
Post a Comment